|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HONG
KONG
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANADA
|
|
|
|
EUROPE
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
INDONESIA
|
|
|
|
|
SINGAPORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
THAILAND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philippines |
|
ON THE ROAD
Air inside vehicles
more polluted
than air outside |
|
Source: Inquirer |
Author: Aida Sevilla-Mendoza |
Date: 1999-06-17 |
|
|
CALIFORNIA has the most stringent
tailpipe emission standards in the entire
United States, yet a two-year $440,000
state Air Resources Board (ARB) study indicated higher levels
of toxic pollutants inside cars than the air outside.
A Scrips McClatchy news feature datelined Sacramento reports
that concentrations of some pollutants and toxic compounds
inside the vehicles of California commuters are as much as 10
times higher than the air outside.
The logical conclusion is that people may be subjected to the
highest daily exposure to air pollutants during their commute to
and from work, the ARB chair said.
What was even more surprising was that the levels of pollutants
inside buses were found to be higher than the air outside, but
not as high as passenger cars.
The study involved 27 especially equipped vehicles-only two of
which were buses-in Sacramento and Los Angeles, the two
areas of California where motor vehicles account for the highest
proportion of air pollution. The researchers used more sensitive
measuring instruments than those used in another study in 1988
by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The ARB
findings confirmed the results of the 1988 study.
The ARB spokesperson said that in general, levels of toxics
(including henzene, formaldehyde, toluene, xylene, MTBE,
heavy metals, hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide) are higher
inside vehicles than outside ambient air since cars are
surrounded by emissions from other vehicles on freeways and
streets.
The researchers found that as much as one-half of the
pollutants inside test cars were emitted by the vehicle ahead.
Thus, pollution levels are highly sensitive to traffic patterns and
motorists who use less congested traffic lanes or are farther
away from the truck lanes were exposed to lower pollution
levels.
The moral of the story, applied here in Manila, is that
airconditioning won't spare you from the pollutants coming out
of the tailpipe of the vehicle ahead of you. Moreover, it is
healthier to drive or commute when there is less traffic and to
avoid driving behind a smoke-belching truck, bus, jeepney or
diesel-fueled sport utility vehicle (SUV). This caveat goes
double for children, who are more susceptible to air pollution.
Meanwhile, despite the health risks caused by motor vehicles,
auto sales are booming in America. A record 6.9 million vehicles
were sold in the first five months of the year in the United
States, up from a robust 6.4 million for the year-ago period,
Robyn Meredith of The New York Times reports. Auto
manufacturers, flush with profits from five fat years, are
scrambling to keep up with the demand for pickup trucks and
SUVs by going on an expansion binge totaling billions of
dollars.
And for good reason. In 1990, 67 percent of new vehicle sales
consisted of cars while light trucks (SUVs, minivans and
pickups) made up the rest. Last year, the sales gap between cars
and trucks declined dramatically-cars cornered 52.4 percent of
sales while light trucks got 47.6 percent.
Even European carmakers are getting into the act. BMW,
encouraged by the success of its rival Mercedes-Benz's M-class
SUV, will begin building this fall its X5 "sports activity vehicle"
at its South Carolina factory where its Z3 roadsters are now
built. BMW will invest $600 million to expand the factory and
plans to hire 1,000 more workers to build the X5.
Toyota, which recently launched the Tundra, its first large,
eight-cylinder pickup, is reportedly spending $500 million to
expand its $700-million pickup factory in Indiana.
But Detroit is not sitting still while the Europeans and Japanese
invade their SUV territory. Ford, for example, has announced it
would assemble a new luxury pickup truck, the Lincoln
Blackwood, at the factory where it produces its F-series
pickups.
The strong sales of light trucks are driving auto manufacturers
to expand, but in doing so they are gambling that the US
economy will just keep on growing. It's a big gamble, but right
now, judging from booming auto sales figures, a recession
seems improbable in the US.
|
|
|
|