|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HONG
KONG
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANADA
|
|
|
|
EUROPE
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
INDONESIA
|
|
|
|
|
SINGAPORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
THAILAND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philippines |
|
ON THE MOVE
Protecting your car |
|
Source: Inquirer |
Author: Segundo E. Romero |
Date: 1999-06-17 |
|
|
MANY readers wrote to ask for more
information about the sump guard I
mentioned in a previous column. I
checked with Honda and Toyota dealers, and found out that the
Honda CRV and the Toyota RAV4 are both equipped with these
covers that serve to protect the front underside of vehicles.
Honda people call it an engine splash shield, while Toyota
people call it an engine cover. The function is the same--to
protect the engine, fan belts, radiators and other sensitive
engine parts from stones and other loose objects that might
damage the car.
The new Corollas have engine covers as standard equipment.
These are smaller than those installed on Toyota's 4-wheel
drives. Civics, on the other hand, do not have splash shields
because the Honda people argue they are meant for city driving.
Well, the Civic chief engineer probably did not know that city
driving in Metro Manila can mean driving in off-road
conditions.
Both Honda and Toyota on Quezon Avenue said they could
fabricate splash guards for their cars which are not yet equipped
with them. Two materials can be used--automotive steel or hard
plastic like polypropylene. Metal is cheaper at about
P2,000-P3,000, but it corrodes easily. Plastic is better for the long
term, but will cost about P5000-P7000 plastic.
There are many accessories that protect and give a sporty look
to cars nowadays. Hard recyclable plastic bumpers, side
moldings, wheel arch protectors, and body cladding are
standard features for many SUVs and AUVs. They protect the
car from the smallest scratches to the most powerful collisions.
Usually, these are not painted, to make them recyclable. In the
Philippines, car owners choose to have them painted for
esthetic reasons.
Being environmentally unfriendly is not too bad in this case.
Some protectors, however, can do more damage than good, and
owners ironically believe they afford protection. A case in point
is the use of bull bars. Based on 1998 US safety requirements,
the use of bull bars is not advisable for two reasons: 1) they
reduce the effectivity of SRS (supplemental restraint system)
airbags sensors; and, 2) they cause extensive injuries to people
accidentally hit by vehicles with such accessories.
In other words, protecting your car can endanger you, as well as
some unwitting, hapless pedestrians out there. Unfortunately, in
car accessory-crazy Manila, car owners do not care to know
which is real protection. And even if they knew, they still
probably would not care, so long as the esthetics are right.
* * *
Questions? Comments? Please e-mail seromero@hotmail.com.
|
|
|
|