|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HONG
KONG
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANADA
|
|
|
|
EUROPE
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
INDONESIA
|
|
|
|
|
SINGAPORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
THAILAND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philippines |
|
FULL TANK
Law on lemons
for cars; bye Mara |
|
Source: Inquirer |
Author: None |
Date: 1999-07-15 |
|
|
I READ a letter suggesting that the
management of traffic in the metropolis
be privatized. Meaning, the government
should give up its mandate in directing traffic in the city.
I think the idea is sound. It should be given a serious thought.
For decades, the city has been in chaos, traffic-wise. Maybe it's
time to change coaches. As in basketball, if the coach has not
been winning championships, he has to go.
The government has not been winning against monstrous traffic
jams in the metropolis. The private sector may have better ideas
to lick the problem. Why don't we give it a try?
* * *
We've been losing P4 billion annually because of traffic jams.
Vehicles not moving at all in a traffic gridlock, or vehicles barely
moving at all, mean money going up in smoke.
Wasted hours on the road because of traffic snarls are hours
translated into deficits, never profits.
People stranded on the streets because of traffic snarls means
huge losses for factories because of lack of manpower.
Yet, through the years, the government has not done anything
concrete to solve the traffic problem.
The problem is there. The solution is there. Yet, nothing is done.
Who says we are not a patient race?
We waited 14 years before we toppled the Marcos dictatorship.
Are we going to spend a lifetime waiting for government action
on the traffic problem?
* * *
I still remember what Imee Marcos said when asked what was
the precious thing that she truly enjoys most about her being
the daughter of Ferdinand Marcos.
"No traffic for me," said Imee.
That was in the '60s yet.
Marcos is long gone. Cory is gone. Ramos is gone. But traffic is
still with us.
Erap will soon be gone, too. But will traffic also remain after he
leaves Malaca$ang in 2004_that is, if he survives his six-year
tearm?
We can only make a guess.
* * *
Art Balmadrid and Sheila Tolentino of Isuzu Philippines Corp.
faxed me a note on Monday about the noontime launch of the
new Hi-Lander, the X-TRM, tomorrow at the Ilustrado.
Will Edu Manzano, now the Makati vice mayor, be around? You
know, it was Edu who modeled for the Hi-Lander when it was
launched a while back.
Speaking of Isuzus, I rode on Gov. Manny Pinol's 4x4 Isuzu
twice already when I was in Davao recently. It rode well, even at
high speeds. I noticed that the faster I drove, the more stable
was my ride.
Here's a revelation: I believe the Isuzu pickup outfuels every
vehicle in its class.
* * *
Bonjin Bolinao, ever the good lady that she is, will tender a
get-together dinner for Ms Mara Gabot, her dear friend for
years, tomorrow.
It's by invitation. RSVP (Respondez S'il Vous Plait: I hope my
spelling is right, Bonjin?).
Mara, a most friendly doll in the car industry, is leaving Volvo
and Bonjin will use the affair by way of bidding goodbye to
Mara while at the same time wishing Mara all the luck in her next
career venture.
I got an invitation. Kaya lang, baka maiyak ako pag nagpunta
ako?
Dyahe to admit pero I'm really a softie when it comes to
goodbyes.
* * *
That $4.9 billion awarded to six passengers of a Malibu who
suffered serious burns when the car's gas tank exploded after
getting bumped from behind some years ago is a world record.
General Motors has appealed, initially contending that the
accident happened not because Malibu was a defective car but
because the gas tank explosion was caused by the impact of
collision of a truck coming from behind.
Actually, the court decision did not surprise me.
In the United States, cases involving a giant company against
consumers would almost always result to a victory in favor of
the consumer. Which I like very much.
* * *
Over here, many car buyers complain a lot about having bought
lemons for cars. When they argue their case, they lose. When
they try to return their cars and ask for a replacement, they are
turned down.
I have received many complaints myself.
Again in the US, complaining is the least of worries of
consumers. You buy a pair of shoes there, use it for a week,
months even, return it afterward, no problem. For as long as you
have the receipt, you'll get your money back.
I think it's about time that Congress enacts a law to protect
customers who have bought lemons for cars. Better still, why
not a law that altogether allows a buyer to return, if not
exchange, the commodity when he feels like doing it?
This suggestion is kinda wild, if not weird, but then, by
adopting such a law, aren't we teaching our capitalists a lesson
or two on how to make their products at top-level quality at all
times?
Maybe a public debate on this should be held?
I have yet to see a car-buyer who felt he had bought a lemon
plead his case in court. Maybe, somebody should do it. A good
test case.
Who knows, one court decision favorable to the car-buyer
might yet spark a call for the adoption of such a law.
* * *
QUOTE ME. In the rains, always keep your distance. Brakes are
not always that dependable on slippery roads.
|
|
|
|