|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HONG
KONG
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANADA
|
|
|
|
EUROPE
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
INDONESIA
|
|
|
|
|
SINGAPORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
THAILAND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philippines |
|
Are we ready for the
intelligent traveler? /2 |
|
Source: Inquirer |
Author: Hazel P. Villa |
Date: 2000-02-13 |
|
|
Awakening
It was only in 1973, when the DOT was formed, that awareness
for the preservation of a rich cultural heritage came about.
The National Museum and the National Historical Institute set
up local museums. Currently, the National Museum cares for 14
branch museums and four archaeological sites, while the NHI
looks after at least 27 historical museums and shrines.
Cultural tourism, according to the National Museum and the
NHI, ''is coming to be seen not only as a source of economic
growth but also as a means of promoting civic and national
pride.''
Noted for their successful attempts in promoting cultural and
heritage tourism are Vigan and Taal in Luzon and Silay City in
Negros Occidental, places known for stately ancestral homes,
and Bohol, for impressive churches.
Iloilo also managed to preserve some of its ancestral homes in
Jaro district, the country's first Millionaires' Row. Its churches
and cemeteries, which bear heavy Spanish influence, have been
restored.
At the strategic planning workshop sponsored last year by the
DOT and the Canadian Urban Institute, owners and manager of
hotels, resorts, museums, travel agencies, booking offices and
other tourism-related establishments agreed that the Visayas
should focus on aggressively marketing itself as a heritage and
cultural site.
But Iloilo participants realized that they have to laboriously
climb the steep mountain of challenges.
Firstly, some culturally important areas are in a state of disrepair,
such as the historic Fort San Pedro, where many invading forces
that came by sea were repulsed by Ilonggos.
Then, there is the widespread ignorance of the richness of
Ilonggo culture and the tourism network.
All these contribute to a lackluster performance in selling Iloilo
as the cultural experience in the Visayas.
Collective effort
Maclaren said these problems were could be seen even in other
developed places trying to make a go of this new tourism
commodity.
He cited Alberta province in Canada as a case study, with its
five World Heritage Sites, cowboys and Indians, plus
mountains. Despite all these cultural riches, Alberta has been
lagging behind as a tourism site, he said.
Its tourism network had to contend with problems, like an
increasing demand for a sensitive ecosystem, a scene-stealing
shopping mall, and too much concentration of tourism in the
central areas, like Banff and the Rocky Mountain Parks.
These problems were solved by easing pressures on traditional
tourism destinations, focusing marketing on key visitor groups
like the Japanese and Europeans, developing cross-border
partnerships and establishing a market coordinating body.
''This shows that marketing partnerships can still be successful
and that different layers of government can work together
effectively toward a common goal,'' said Maclaren.
Given that the Philippines' culture and tourism developers have
put their acts together to promote certain destinations, the
community must also be involved to sustain the momentum.
Moneymaking ventures
As in the case of other Asian countries, what many areas in the
Philippines lack in old churches, ancestral homes and rice
terraces, they make up for with food, drink, music, theater,
festivals, leisure activities, cultural landscapes, religion, arts and
crafts, and the ever-entertaining notion of celebration.
This is their way of presenting their culture and heritage as a
moneymaking venture. (In Singapore and Hong Kong, it surely
sells.)
A response to the call of the times in tourism is needed to bring
in those valuable dollars. The intelligent tourist, as other
countries have proved, does not mind spending for a place and
experiencing some inconveniences if the visual and intellectual
attractions are all worth it.
Heritage and cultural tourism is but one aspect of the
multifaceted tourism industry. The lessons in it could apply to
the whole industry as well.
The EIU is right in saying the archipelago must be serious in
developing its tourism sector.
While the potential for the Philippines in the long term is clearly
substantial, careful handling of these and other issues will
determine the speed and success with which tourism develops.
Some are anxious that it be pushed hard ahead so as not to
overtaken by regional neighbors, like Vietnam and Burma.
A greater danger is that it should proceed so fast and not learn
from the mistakes of others.
|
|
|
|