|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HONG
KONG
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANADA
|
|
|
|
EUROPE
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
INDONESIA
|
|
|
|
|
SINGAPORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
THAILAND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philippines |
|
Bakun: It takes a
mountain village |
|
Source: Inquirer |
Author: Maurice Malanes |
Date: 2000-08-20 |
|
|
BAKUN, Benguet-On the
towering peaks of Luzon's Gran
Cordillera Central, cold winds
sweep over the collection of
settlements of the Kankanaey
and Bago clans which have
inhabited the rugged mountain
valleys of northern Benguet since
time beyond memory.
It takes a tortuous four-hour bus
ride from Baguio City to reach
Bakun, one of the 13 towns of
Benguet province almost at the border with Ilocos Sur, and the
homeland of the Kankanaey and the Bago.
Bakun (pop: 13,500) is classified as a fifth-class municipality.
But it is a first-class town in many ways, not least the fact that it
is a good place to observe a local community's initiative in
protectng, conserving, developing and managing its
environment.
The town has virgin forests, four rivers and several springs
teeming with fish, rice terraces, vegetable gardens, swidden
farms -- all of which are maintained by a hardy, industrious
people using their traditional institutions.
In 1997, the town's council of elders fined a man from the town
of Cervantes in Ilocos Sur and asked him to pay two carabaos
(water buffaloes) to a family here. The man had been accused of
poisoning the Bakun River.
Two carabaos died after drinking from the river, which the man
from Cervantes and three accomplices had laced with sodium
cyanide, a deadly chemical that villagers said the ''outsiders''
used to catch fish.
The three accomplices escaped the community's wrath.
Villagers caught the Cervantes man and brought him before the
elders who, after hearing all sides, ordered the man to replace
the two poisoned carabaos.
''The penalty was not even enough,'' said Amos Beta-a, a
member of the council. ''The two carabaos could not repay the
poisoned young fish, shrimps and eels.''
But the incident had sent a strong message. No one has ever
tried to poison the Bakun River again, Beta-a said.
Green gold
A few years ago, the vegetable terraces and farms which the
Bakun community regards as its ''green gold'' faced a threat from
a potentially profitable business proposition brought before the
town leaders.
Bakun's vegetable farmers are very modest about the income
they derive from their vegetable cash crops that you cannot get
them to tell you how much they are earning from these farms.
But the children of local farmers who are sent and continue to
be sent to college and the ''Elf'' trucks and vehicles that some of
the farmers have acquired and continue to acquire all show that
there is indeed gold in vegetables.
In 1997, a mining company had wanted to mine gold in Barangay
Gambang, a farming village near the Halsema Highway, the main
artery linking Manila to the vegetable-farming communities of
Benguet.
To help convince the villagers, the company, Dalton Pacific,
employed some influential people from the community as
supervisors and liaison officers.
The gold that the mine would be extracting, the company said,
would benefit the community in the form of jobs, more municipal
revenues and infrastructure. But most of community members
were not convinced and protested.
In short, the mining company's proposed entry created conflict
in the community.
To help resolve the conflict, Vice Mayor Tirso Bayawa invited
representatives from the Mines and Geosciences Bureau of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the
company, the municipal and barangay governments, and the
affected communities.
Representatives of these bodies presented their side before the
papangoan or council of elders of the Bakun Indigenous Tribes
Organization, a municipal-wide grassroots people's organization.
The council's membership is made up of elders from Bakun's
seven barangays.
The opposition argued well its position against the company's
plans.
If the company were to mine the upper Gambang village, the
water sources of communities below would dry up, the
oppositors said.
Once the water sources dry up, the community would lose its
vegetable farms.
The barangay's vegetable industry, they argued, has also
brought income, jobs and other side-industries such as
transportation and restaurant businesses to the town.
The council of elders weighed the benefits of what the mining
firm promised and what the farmers were getting from their
vegetable crops.
The elders gave more weight to the opposition's argument.
The company soon packed up and left.
Conflict settlement
The two cases show how community interests govern the
decision-making on the part of the village elders, the
papangoan.
The council of elders is sought after for its authority not only in
dispensing justice but also in articulating community positions
on controversial issues such as development projects like mines
and dams.
Members of this council are chosen not just for their age, but
also for their wisdom, integrity and impartiality.
Once a case is brought before it, the council, which involves as
many as 15 to 20 elders, hears the contending parties. It decides
its verdict through a process of consensus called tongtong.
The tongtong is an unwritten justice system, handed down
through generations. This system exists only in the memory of
wise elders who have been proven to be the best arbiters in the
community. Public opinion reinforces the verdict of the elders'
council.
Bain or shame is the ultimate sanction against crime. A person
adjudged guilty will have to bear the shame that comes with
wrongdoing.
The tongtong system covers all aspects of conflicts,
misbehavior and crimes -- from marital woes, land disputes,
abuse and rape of women and murder to burning of forests and
poisoning of rivers.
The system is participatory. Each community member present in
a tongtong hearing can participate in the deliberations.
Contending parties go to the tongtongan or community court
with their relatives. As soon as both parties are duly
represented, an elder may start the session by presenting the
background of the case or may immediately call the complaining
party to present its case.
A complainant may appoint a relative to present the complaint.
The other party is then called on to argue, deny or admit the
complaint.
|
|
|
|